Inflow of highly skilled migrants
New residence permits for highly skilled work, EU Blue Cards and researchers, per 100,000 inhabitants.
European Union over time
Permits per 100,000 inhabitants
The story
Europe has tripled its intake of highly skilled migrants in a decade, from 10 permits per 100,000 inhabitants in 2013 to a peak of 32.6 in 2022. Then it stalled. The number has fallen two years running, to 28.7 in 2024. The intake is also concentrated: Germany alone accounts for roughly a quarter of the EU total, and the Netherlands, Spain, France and Ireland take most of the rest.
Why it matters
A skilled migrant is imported R&D capacity that someone else paid to educate. Inflows compound: talent goes where talent already is, which is how small initial gaps become structural ones. Highly skilled permits are only about one in nine of all EU work permits, so this is a thin slice of a much larger migration flow, and the slice that decides research and technology capacity.
Policy context
The EU Blue Card was meant to be Europe's answer to the competition for global talent. It remains a minority of the total: most highly skilled arrivals still come through national schemes, and Denmark and Ireland opt out of the Blue Card entirely. Recognition of qualifications still stops at internal borders. The Draghi report treats talent attraction as a competitiveness input rather than a migration debate, and this indicator keeps score.
How this number is calculated
Eurostat first residence permits issued for remunerated activities, counting the three highly skilled reasons that make up the category: national highly skilled worker schemes, EU Blue Cards and researchers. Normalised per 100,000 inhabitants using World Bank population data. The EU-27 total is summed from the member states rather than taken from Eurostat's own EU aggregate row, which omits national highly skilled schemes for several years and would show a false trend break. A year appears only when all 27 members have reported.
This indicator is European only, and deliberately so. The nearest United States equivalent, H-1B approvals, measures a lottery-capped visa: the number reflects a policy ceiling rather than employer demand, the published series is unreliable after 2022, and the two instruments count different things. China publishes no comparable series. Rather than present a comparison that would mislead, we show Europe's own trajectory and say plainly that no fair benchmark exists.
Source & cadence
Related policy insights
No insight references this indicator yet; new analyses appear here automatically.
Browse insights